It was an interview that spoke of "voter apathy" and "revolution". Powerful sentiments, and ones I share. The integrity of his words, however, remains somewhat sketchy.
A few days later, Brand was one of many who participated in the Million Mask March, an event that saw thousands, if not the target million, of people in countries around the world, march through the streets as a collective, each wearing replicas of the Guy Fawkes mask worn by the eponymous protagonist in V For Vendetta. Late in the evening, Brand stopped to sign autographs for fans who recognised him.
Wait, what?
Yep, you guessed it, Brand unmasked. Which, on the face of it, somewhat undermines the very purpose of the mask itself. V wore the mask for practical reasons, yes. His entire body was horrifically burned in the fire at Larkhill, and it was suggested there was little left of his face. But any mask can cover those wounds. V wore that particular mask symbolically, in remembrance of the previous attempt to destroy the Houses of Parliament. V was big on symbolism.
So what was the symbolism of the mask? V said it himself: "Ideas are bulletproof." V himself was killed as a result of the final climactic showdown with Creedy and his goons, but that was just the man beneath the mask. The idea he fought and died for, however, lived, and thousands descended on the centre of London, past military barricades, to watch Parliament blow up. And all of them wore the mask. They were all as one at that moment, unified in a common belief: that it was time for a change. A removal of the old guard, of the crippling constraints and fears, of the oppression and tyranny, of an establishment that had long since lost the faith and conviction of those it claimed to serve.
The mask itself represented that idea, and it has grown beyond a simple movie prop or comic book device. The mask has become a symbol of a desire for change in a real sense. The hacktivist collective Anonymous is perhaps the most renowned for its use of the mask, but it's not alone. In fact, it's arguable that Anonymous are partly responsible for making the mask as iconic as it has become. It has, in fact, become the very symbol it was meant to be in the comic and movie.
The Million Mask March is evidence of the power of a symbol. That people in many countries marched as one while wearing the mask shows that there is a growing, and powerful, voice of dissension and disenfranchisement with the state of the world. Thanks to a level of communication unprecedented in human history, there is a very strong sense of a global community, through social media, blogs such as this, and instant news. And as a global community, we have become more aware of the actions of our leaders, governments, corporations and financial institutions, and the effects of those actions on the rest of us - the 99%, as the general populace has become known. Moreover, there is a strong feeling that we, the 99%, are increasingly being marginalised by an elite caste whose overriding concern is with its own interests and avarice, the rest of us be damned.
The London part of the Million Mask March |
The revolution for which Brand calls is one I believe is coming. But it's not nearly as easy as a simple jingoistic war cry from a celebrity fop. We have become so accustomed to the way of things - governments making decisions for us, banks telling us how important it is to have money, corporations reminding us daily that we need their products and services, only for us to capitulate like good little consumers - that removing it all from our lives could be too much to take all at once. Panic would flood the streets, chaos would ensue.
Change needs to occur. But not all at once. We simply wouldn't cope with it. And the truth of the matter is that, like Brand, I don't have an answer. I don't know how this change should occur, what should replace the current order, and how we carry on beyond it. But I do know that, jingoistic and ego-driven though he may be, Russell Brand spoke to a lot of people on several levels in that interview, and in some ways made sense.
Oh yeah, I almost forgot. The whole thing about him taking off his mask. Well, he wanted to sign autographs for his fans, didn't he? Make of that what you will, dear reader. But he wasn't the only one to unmask - indeed, there were many who didn't even have so much as a scarf to cover their face. But making the lack or removal of a mask the focus of this matter is a merely a diversion. It's not the messenger, or the words, we should focus on, but the spirit and substance of the message. The symbolism embodied by thousands of people worldwide congregating in a common cause. The mask is a powerful symbol, but one does not need to be reliant upon it to deliver the message.
As for the revolution? Well, it will be more than televised, it will be on Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, Instagram, and if you look hard enough, probably even the news. But the aftermath of said revolution? That's the grey area we need to clear up.
Comments and discussion more than welcome, they are encouraged.